Breaking news

Trump’s DOGE slashes DEI contracts, targeting blue states and education funding

Trump's team slashes DEI contracts, igniting a red vs. blue state battle over inclusion, spending cuts, and the future of federal policy.

Donald Trump targets DEI contracts and education funding, pushing for merit-based spending reforms and reshaping federal priorities in blue states. Photo: GLR News Composition/ Thilbault Camus/ EFE/ iStock.com
Donald Trump targets DEI contracts and education funding, pushing for merit-based spending reforms and reshaping federal priorities in blue states. Photo: GLR News Composition/ Thilbault Camus/ EFE/ iStock.com

The Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has initiated significant cuts to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, targeting contracts in predominantly Democratic-led states. This move aligns with the administration's broader agenda to reduce government spending on initiatives it deems divisive.

Elon Musk leads federal push to eliminate DEI rules, redirecting millions toward merit-based government contracts

Elon Musk, leading DOGE's efforts, has been instrumental in revising federal acquisition rules to eliminate DEI considerations from government contracts. The General Services Administration (GSA) announced changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), aiming to restore merit-based evaluations and end perceived discrimination in public and private sectors. ​

Specific departments have also taken action; the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) canceled $4 million in DEI-focused contracts after DOGE's task force identified $260 million in potential savings. HUD Secretary Scott Turner emphasized redirecting funds to better serve the American people. ​

Controversial DEI cuts spark debate as Trump administration shifts focus to merit-based policies and spending reform

These cuts have sparked controversy, with critics arguing that they disproportionately affect blue states and undermine efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. Supporters contend that the measures are necessary to eliminate wasteful spending and prioritize merit-based policies.

The administration's actions reflect a broader push to reevaluate and potentially dismantle DEI initiatives within the federal government, signaling a significant shift in policy priorities.