As clocks spring forward tonight, health risks and legislative debates spotlight Daylight Saving Time's future
As the United States prepares to adjust clocks for daylight saving time on March 9, 2025, debates intensify over the practice's relevance. Health experts highlight associated risks, while legislative efforts to abolish biannual changes face hurdles.
As the United States prepares tonight to "spring forward" on March 9, 2025, by setting clocks ahead one hour for Daylight Saving Time (DST), discussions about the practice's implications have intensified. Originally introduced during World War I to conserve energy, DST's relevance in modern society is increasingly questioned due to health concerns and legislative debates.
Recent studies have highlighted the adverse health effects associated with the biannual time shift. Disruptions to circadian rhythms can lead to increased risks of heart attacks, strokes and sleep disturbances. These findings have prompted health experts to advocate for reevaluating the necessity of DST in contemporary times.
Health implications of Daylight Saving Time
The transition into DST has been linked to various health issues. Research indicates a spike in heart attacks, strokes and workplace injuries following the time change. Sleep experts argue that the misalignment between biological clocks and social schedules can lead to sleep deprivation, affecting overall well-being. These health concerns have fueled arguments for reevaluating the necessity of DST.
In recent years, there have been legislative attempts to abolish the biannual clock changes. The Sunshine Protection Act, introduced by Senator Rick Scott, aims to make DST permanent, eliminating the need to adjust clocks twice a year. Despite passing the Senate unanimously in 2022, the bill has yet to be voted on by the House. President Donald Trump has expressed ambivalence toward the time change, acknowledging the mixed public opinion and complexity surrounding the issue.
Spring ahead' for daylight saving time with some sleep tips. Photo: Audacy.
Public opinion and future outlook
Public feeling regarding DST is divided. A recent Gallup poll reveals that 54% of Americans prefer standard time year-round over DST. This division reflects the complexity of implementing a uniform time policy across diverse regions with varying preferences. As discussions continue, the future of DST remains uncertain, with potential reforms hinged on balancing health considerations, economic impacts and public opinion.
As the nation adjusts its clocks this weekend, the ongoing debate serves as a reminder of the need to critically assess longstanding practices in light of contemporary evidence and societal needs. Whether DST will persist or be reformed remains a topic of national discourse, reflecting the evolving understanding of time, health and productivity. Proponents of the time change, though, say people are grateful to have more sunshine after the traditional work day and that the policy can reduce energy usage and improve quality of life.
